Blok Logo

Comparisons

How is Blok different from other backend frameworks?

Comparisons

How is Blok different from other existing backend frameworks?

Express.js

Express.js is the most popular Node.js framework. It's minimal, flexible, and widely adopted.

Blok takes a different approach by focusing on structure and observability. As a side effect, you have built-in testing patterns and metrics compared to manually setting up these tools in Express.

Blok works great if you want more control over workflow execution, testing individual units of logic, and having observability out of the box.

Feature Table

FeatureBlokExpress
RoutingVia TriggersYes
MiddlewareVia NodesYes
TestingBuilt-inManual setup
ObservabilityBuilt-inManual setup
TypeScriptFirst-classVia @types
Workflow OrchestrationYesNo
Multi-RuntimeYesNode.js only
CLI ToolsYesNo
Deployment ToolsYesNo

Additional Features

Features that differentiate Blok from Express:

FeatureBlokExpress
Node-based ArchitectureYesNo
Workflow JSON DefinitionYesNo
Context FlowYesNo
Built-in MetricsYesNo
gRPC SupportYesNo
AI Node GenerationYesNo

When to use Express vs Blok

Use Express for simple APIs and rapid prototyping where you don't need structured workflows.

Use Blok when you need testability, observability, and clear separation of business logic.

NestJS

NestJS is a powerful framework based on TypeScript and dependency injection. It offers many cool features with decorators and modules.

Higher Complexity

As Blok is designed to be explicit rather than magic, you may need more understanding of workflows and nodes to get started. In return, Blok offers better transparency.

For a simple REST API, NestJS might be a better choice if you prefer decorator-based patterns.

Observability

One key difference is observability. While NestJS requires additional setup for metrics and monitoring, Blok includes Prometheus metrics out of the box.

In comparison, the transparency of Blok allows you to see exactly how your workflows execute, making debugging and optimization easier.

Feature Comparison

FeatureBlokNestJS
Learning CurveModerateSteep
TypeScriptFirst-classFirst-class
Dependency InjectionManualBuilt-in
TestingBuilt-inBuilt-in
ObservabilityBuilt-inManual setup
GraphQLManualBuilt-in
MicroservicesYesYes
Workflow OrchestrationYesNo

Migration Path

You can gradually introduce Blok into existing NestJS applications by using nodes for specific business logic.

Traditional Node.js

Traditional Node.js development with vanilla modules and custom architectures.

Structure

The main advantage of Blok over vanilla Node.js is structure. Blok provides:

  • Clear separation between business logic (nodes) and execution flow (workflows)
  • Built-in testing patterns for each node
  • Observability without additional setup
  • Deployment tools to ship your code

When to Choose

Traditional Node.js is great when:

  • You have specific architectural needs
  • You're building unique systems
  • You prefer complete freedom

Blok is better when:

  • You want proven patterns
  • You need observability out of the box
  • You value testability
  • You want faster development

Best of Both Worlds

Blok doesn't lock you in—you can still use any npm package and integrate with existing Node.js code.

Microservices Platforms

Platforms like Temporal, Camunda, or Apache Airflow offer workflow orchestration but with higher complexity.

Lower Barrier to Entry

Blok is code-first and developer-friendly. You don't need to learn complex UIs or proprietary languages. Your workflows are JSON, your logic is TypeScript.

Deployment Flexibility

Unlike platforms that require infrastructure setup, Blok workflows can deploy to:

  • Serverless platforms (Vercel, Netlify, AWS Lambda)
  • Containers (Docker, Kubernetes)
  • Traditional servers
  • Deskree's Atomic platform

Ready to try Blok?

Start with Quick Start or dive into First Steps!